V Hill, the appellant claimed that his bank should render accounts and profits on how his money was being used

V</u> Hill, the appellant claimed that his bank should render accounts and profits on how his money was being used

The consumer owes a duty when planning on taking care into the performing their purchase so as to not misguide the lending company or facilitate forgery

  1. This has essentially been approved that they stand-in a borrower-collector relationships.
  • Where in actuality the financial get deposits of cash on the customer. (Right here the lending company is the debtor of the consumer and must shell out to the demand).
  • The spot where the bank loans money to the customers. (Right here, the fresh new banker ‘s the creditor together with customers ‘s the borrower).

In Foley lord Cottenham noted that the relationship is debtor-creditor rather than bailment. To this effect, the bank can utilise customer’s money without prior permission of the customer… subject to the condition that it shall be repaid on demand. The court in Joachimson V Swiss Bank Corporation followed the above position… Atkin J added that the bank should only pay on demand during working hours and in the branch of initial payment (technology now makes payment flexible). The debtor-creditor position has also been maintained in the following cases: Osawaye V National Provincial Bank Ltd; Carr V Carr; Sims V Bond, Yusuf V Co-operative Bank Ltd to mention a few.

Nothing wonder Lord Goddard immediately after mentioned that alone that features money in a financial is the lender by itself.

The client owes a duty for taking proper care into the performing their purchase so as to not mislead the financial institution or helps forgery

  1. Bailment: where the bank accepts a product (including certificate) to have safer custody.
  2. Agency: The bank is regarded as an agent where it collects cheques for and on behalf of its customers-Agbonmabe Bank V CFAO… Where it buys shares, treasury bills and the likes for and on behalf of its customers-Hall V Fuller.
  3. Fiduciary relationship: In Hedley Byrne V Heller and Partners Co, the court noted that the bank would be regarded as being in a fiduciary Bellevue escort reviews relationship where it gives advice to customers with the knowledge that it is being relied upon. A fiduciary duty may also be construed in other deserving circumstances.
  4. Trusteeship/Executorship: the spot where the bank works somebody’s tend to or is asked so you can provide believe property. Brand new trusteeship/executorship dating you may are present.

According to Lord Atkin in Joachimson V Swiss Bank Corporation; the bank undertakes to receive money and pay on demand while the customer on the other part should take care in executing his orders so as not to mislead the bank or facilitate forgery-.

The customer owes a duty for taking care when you look at the performing their purchase whilst never to misguide the financial institution or support forgery

  1. To collect deposits: of cash, valuables, cheques and the likes from, for and on behalf of customers-in Dike V ACB ltd, the bank was compelled to collect deposit from the customer being its duty.
  2. To pay on demand and honour customer’s cheques: Generally, a bank should not dishonour its customer’s cheque or demand (Conditions for a dishonour shall be discussed later). A wrongful dishonour ount to a breach of the contractual relationship-s entitling the customer to damages. In Roline V Steward, the court held that damages is presumed where the customer is a trader. In Ejimofor V UBN however, the court held that delay in payment without more would not amount to wrongful dishonour. In this case, the customer payee got impatient and left after waiting for several hours in the bank. The court held that the delay by the bank does not necessarily amount to a dishonour.

The duty to pay on demand does not prevent the bank from making enquiries and exercising due care and skill before making the payment-Karak Rubber co V Burden and Others.

The client owes an obligation to take care and attention within the doing their buy whilst never to mislead the bank or assists forgery

  1. Duty off secrecy: to treat the customer’s recommendations and you may things given that private and you may purely private. Suitable out-of privacy is maintained because of the Area 37 of one’s 1999 composition subject to certain legal justifications.